The Philosopher’s Stone

Philosopher's Stone Alchemy Hermeticism

One thought on “The Philosopher’s Stone

  1. To be honest, I do not think that too many magicians nowadays are dismissive of practical magic, or refuse to acknowledge its reality. There have always been dilettantes and those who remain in the shallows, but I do not think that the situation is any worse than it has been for around a century or so now, when practical magic really got marginalized (really the worst example of it that I have seen in recent memory was John Michael Greer insulting practical magic, and even then he at least acknowledged its reality). Seeing empirical results is not some rare thing written about in books, as I am sure you know well. It is just something that pops up when you do the work. Gatekeeping has always been common to occultism, of course, but in reality most of those people tend to self-select themselves out quite early on. The good author of the Arbatel was on to something when he said that a magician is born as such from his mother, but it does not have to do with an inherent spiritual difference so much as the combination of characteristics and life circumstances to be come invested in and actually practice magic.

    In any case, thank you for providing this lesson on alchemy. More familiar with scrying and conjuration, so this was very much appreciated. It is good to have you back. Posted this a second time as I am not sure if the site ate up the first post. Apologies.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply